<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>The lone C++ coder's blog - Comments</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/</link>
    <description>The lone C++ coder's blog - Diary of a supposedly experienced C++ developer</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.4.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 19:34:15 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Mark Turney: A neater way of handling common exceptions</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/142-A-neater-way-of-handling-common-exceptions.html#c1592</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/142-A-neater-way-of-handling-common-exceptions.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=142</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Mark Turney)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    This looks like a great solution to the problem of duplicated exception handling code.  Thanks for the technique Timo! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/142-guid.html#c1592</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Ben Craig: A neater way of handling common exceptions</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/142-A-neater-way-of-handling-common-exceptions.html#c1588</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/142-A-neater-way-of-handling-common-exceptions.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=142</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Ben Craig)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Careful with that pattern.  On Windows (and probably other OS&#039;s), exception information is stored on the stack.  Each time you rethrow an exception, your stack grows a fair amount.  If you rethrow too many times, you will blow your stack. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/142-guid.html#c1588</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Len Holgate: Some clarifications regarding last week's anti-VC6 rant</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/133-Some-clarifications-regarding-last-weeks-anti-VC6-rant.html#c1574</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/133-Some-clarifications-regarding-last-weeks-anti-VC6-rant.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=133</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Len Holgate)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I agree that for a new development project for a single client I&#039;d be asking serious questions if they were insisting on VC6 rather than VS2008. In fact I went as far as collecting a selection of reasons why it&#039;s a bad choice using this Stack Overflow question.

But, if you need to support a large number of clients with a common code base then sometimes you&#039;re forced to support older compilers; I would imagine this is even worse when you add in cross platform support. 

Luckily there doesn&#039;t seem to be the same draw for people to stay with VS.Net and VS.Net 2003 as there was for people to stay with VC6 (at least not amongst my clients, they now tend to be VS2005 or VS2005 AND VS2008), so I expect the situation will improve over time rather than us having the same discussion in 10 years about VS2005... Even Microsoft recognise this effect; dubbing VS2010 the &quot;new 6&quot;... 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:24:54 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/133-guid.html#c1574</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Alex Ott: Paul Graham on the effect of disruptions to programmer productivity</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/126-Paul-Graham-on-the-effect-of-disruptions-to-programmer-productivity.html#c1568</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/126-Paul-Graham-on-the-effect-of-disruptions-to-programmer-productivity.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=126</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alex Ott)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Yes, interruption - is very bad things. I hate, when people wandering in office, speaking loudly, etc. 
This week, half of our team is on vacation, and I spend my time in silence, producing numerous amount of code, only because i can simply think without any interruption 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:11:49 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/126-guid.html#c1568</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>George: Emacs lisp packages under version control</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-Emacs-lisp-packages-under-version-control.html#c1565</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-Emacs-lisp-packages-under-version-control.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=112</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (George)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Nice. It would be nice if you&#039;d group them by categories (like C++, blogging, python, etc). 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 12:53:55 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-guid.html#c1565</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Timo Geusch: Emacs lisp packages under version control</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-Emacs-lisp-packages-under-version-control.html#c1564</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-Emacs-lisp-packages-under-version-control.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=112</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Timo Geusch)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    That&#039;s a good idea, I&#039;ll include that in the post I&#039;m planning to make once I&#039;ve worked out how to get the main configuration files like .emacs and .gnus.el under version control the way I want to. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:15:58 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-guid.html#c1564</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>George: Emacs lisp packages under version control</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-Emacs-lisp-packages-under-version-control.html#c1563</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-Emacs-lisp-packages-under-version-control.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=112</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (George)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    How about sharing a list of emacs packages you&#039;re using? I&#039;m always up for increasing my productivity. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:17:11 +0100</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/112-guid.html#c1563</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Ben: Good article for CEDET beginners like me</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/96-Good-article-for-CEDET-beginners-like-me.html#c1550</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/96-Good-article-for-CEDET-beginners-like-me.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=96</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Ben)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    As someone who has always wanted to try CEDET but has always been too lazy to read the docs, thanks! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/96-guid.html#c1550</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Timo Geusch: Two more useful emacs modes</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#c1549</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=81</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Timo Geusch)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Alex, thanks for the link - sounds very interesting. i&#039;ll have a look at the article later today! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-guid.html#c1549</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Alex Ott: Two more useful emacs modes</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#c1546</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=81</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Alex Ott)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I just uploaded a new article about Cedet&#039;s customization - http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/en/writings/emacs-devenv/EmacsCedet.html
I think, that it could be interested to you 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-guid.html#c1546</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Kevin Godden: The demise of Dr Dobbs Journal - hopefully exaggerated</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/85-The-demise-of-Dr-Dobbs-Journal-hopefully-exaggerated.html#c1543</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/85-The-demise-of-Dr-Dobbs-Journal-hopefully-exaggerated.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=85</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Kevin Godden)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    DDJ is a very good journal, will be sorry to see it go.  Must say though that betimes some of the articles were way over my head!  I don&#039;t think I will be looking in too often on the online journal, I find the DDJ website horrendous!!

I always had a fancy to try and get an article published in the DDJ, I had in mind an article about the use of Prolog in a practical setting, needless to say I never quit got around to it &lt;img src=&quot;http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png&quot; alt=&quot;;-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/85-guid.html#c1543</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>CodersTalk: Two more useful emacs modes</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#c1541</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=81</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (CodersTalk)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi, I would like to try CEDET. Anyway, thanks for sharing!! &lt;img src=&quot;http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png&quot; alt=&quot;;-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-guid.html#c1541</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Eric: Two more useful emacs modes</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#c1540</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-Two-more-useful-emacs-modes.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=81</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Eric)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    If you like which-func-mode, you might want to also like global-semantic-stickyfunc-mode .  It is similar to which-func-mode, but uses the header line, and shows the first line of the function chopped off on the top of the window. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/81-guid.html#c1540</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Timo Geusch: Speeding up Visual C++ compilation by cleaning up the include paths</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/84-Speeding-up-Visual-C++-compilation-by-cleaning-up-the-include-paths.html#c1539</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/84-Speeding-up-Visual-C++-compilation-by-cleaning-up-the-include-paths.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=84</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Timo Geusch)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I was quite surprised that it would be that much of a speed-up I&#039;m certainly pleased with that. Unfortunately I&#039;m still testing the changes - the project is cross-platform and the build structure on one of the other platforms is slightly different to the one on Windows, which leads to all manner of interesting problems. Plus, the Windows part is a subset of the overall build as a few server components aren&#039;t being built on Windows, so there are a few more hoops for me to jump through before the whole set of changes can be merged back into the main development branch.

Due to the size of the project, we are talking several thousand files being touched so you&#039;re not far off with your estimate of millions of changes. This makes it a lot harder to make a sweeping change like this but I think it would be worthwhile in the long run. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/84-guid.html#c1539</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Kevin Godden: Speeding up Visual C++ compilation by cleaning up the include paths</title>
    <link>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/84-Speeding-up-Visual-C++-compilation-by-cleaning-up-the-include-paths.html#c1538</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/84-Speeding-up-Visual-C++-compilation-by-cleaning-up-the-include-paths.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/wfwcomment.php?cid=84</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Kevin Godden)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    That&#039;s quite a speed up for sure ~50%!  It sounds well worth the effort of making the changes, although I assume that theire millions of them to be made - hence the script.  Have you made the changes to the mainline project yet, or are you still testing? 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeblog.bsdninjas.co.uk/index.php?/archives/84-guid.html#c1538</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>